ƽ

Falcon® Conical Tubes, 15 mL

Sterile polypropylene conical tubes for use in cell centrifugation and other cell culture applications

Falcon® Conical Tubes, 15 mL

Sterile polypropylene conical tubes for use in cell centrifugation and other cell culture applications

Catalog #
(Select a product)
Sterile polypropylene conical tubes for use in cell centrifugation and other cell culture applications
Request Pricing Request Pricing

What's Included

  • Falcon® Conical Tubes, 15 mL
    • 50 Units (Catalog #100-0092)
    • 500 Units (Catalog #38009)
    • Corning Catalog #352196

Overview

Use Falcon® Conical Tubes, 15 mL for cell centrifugation and other cell culture applications. These sterile, RNase-/DNase-free polypropylene tubes with caps are equipped with a threaded dome seal closure to ensure liquid is retained during routine laboratory procedures. Falcon® Conical Tubes, 15 mL are available in packs of 50 and 500 tubes.
Subtype
Tubes
Species
Human, Mouse, Non-Human Primate, Other, Rat
Application
Cell Culture, Cell Isolation, Nucleic Acid Purification, Sample Storage
Brand
Falcon

Protocols and Documentation

Find supporting information and directions for use in the Product Information Sheet or explore additional protocols below.

Document Type
Product Name
Catalog #
Lot #
Language
Document Type
Product Name
Catalog #
100-0092, 38009
Lot #
All
Language
English

Applications

This product is designed for use in the following research area(s) as part of the highlighted workflow stage(s). Explore these workflows to learn more about the other products we offer to support each research area.

Resources and Publications

Publications (1)

Streptococcus-mutans and Porphyromonas-gingivalis adhesion to glazed/polished surfaces of CAD/CAM restorations R. Albani et al. Heliyon 2024 Nov

Abstract

PurposeDental restorations fabricated using CAD/CAM require modification/adjustment before cementation. Streptococcus mutans (S.mutans) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (P.gingivalis) are prevalent bacterial species that may adhere to these materials and can cause caries, gingivitis/periodontitis. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bacterial adherence of S.mutans and P.gingivalis to five different kinds of modern CAD/CAM restorative materials with different compositions following chairside finishing/polishing and glazing.Materials and methodsSpecimens (N = 75) from five test materials (n = 15 each) “Tetric-CAD®; IPS-e.max-CAD®; IPS-e.max-ZirCAD®; CELTRA-Duo® and Vita-Enamic®” were prepared in disc shape (10 × 3 mm) using CAD/CAM. The specimens underwent glazing and finishing/polishing using established procedures. The surface roughness was measured in micrometers (μm) using a profilometer. Bacterial adherence to test materials' glazed and finished/polished surfaces was tested using bacterial culture growth over the test materials. Data obtained was tabulated and statistical analysis performed using Kruskal Wallis test, post-hoc Conover test, Mann-Whitney U test and Tukey post hoc test.ResultsWith the exception of IPS-e.max-ZirCAD®, which showed the contrary, the adherence of S.mutans & P.gingivalis was less on glazed surfaces compared to finished/polished surfaces for four test materials: “Tetric-CAD®, IPS-e.max-CAD®, CELTRA-Duo®, and Vita-Enamic®”. On the glazed surfaces, the adhesiveness of S.mutans and P.gingivalis was not significant (p = 0.099; p = 0.660); however, on the finished/polished surfaces, it was significant (p = 0.002; p = 0.004). With the exception of ‘IPS-e.max-ZirCAD®’, which showed the reverse behavior, the adhesion of S.mutans & P.gingivalis to finished/polished surfaces was greater for each of the four ceramics under investigation “Tetric-CAD®, IPS-e.max-CAD®, CELTRA-Duo®, and Vita-Enamic®”.ConclusionGlazed surfaces for majority of test materials demonstrated decreased adhesion from S.mutans & P.gingivalis, hence prior to final placement of restoration, it is advised to adhere to the minimal glazing criteria. Regardless of the chemical composition of the materials, the surface texture of the tested materials significantly influenced bacterial adhesion.